What To Know About Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery

By Margaret Bailey


Approaches to surgical operation are changing and evolving mostly because of major technological advancements that are being made in various fields including surgical medicine. Single incision laparoscopic surgery is often referred to using the abbreviation SILS, but it also has many other names. Among the names SILS goes by are Single-port laparoscopy, single-port access surgery (SPA), Single-access endoscopic surgery (SAES), and single-port incisionnless conventional equipment-using surgery (SPICES). Other names include natural-orifice trannsumbilical surgery (NOTUS), one-port umbilical surgery (OPUS), and laparo-endoscopic singular-site surgery (LESS).

SILS as a technique in laparoscopic surgery is still relatively new because it was only developed recently. Because this method utilizes a single entry point into the body, it is referred to as minimally invasive. The navel is the major entry point used on most patients. Only a small scar remains after the process has been done, which is one of the reasons why this process is preferred by many people.

The entry point can be made into a 20 mm or 11mm incision. The importance of utilizing only a single entry point is to minimize pain and scarring. This is opposed to traditional laparoscopic surgical procedure in which multiple entry point are made and used. New York is home to some of the most well-trained and qualified specialists in this kind of procedure. Thus it would be a great place to consider visiting if one needs such a process done to them.

There are two categories of specialized surgical equipment used by SILS. The two broad categories are hand instruments and access ports instruments. Access ports instruments are of various types including the GelPOINT system, QuadPort+, TriPort15, Uni-X, SILS device, and TriPort+. The manufacturers of these instruments are different.

Conversely, there are three key configurations of hand instruments in use. They include articulating, pre-bent rigid, and standard configurations. It has taken over the past thirty years to develop standard hand tools. They are made with rigid design. The SPL reduced triangulation instrument problem was solved by the development of articulation hand instruments.

A choice always has to be made between standard and articulating instruments by surgeons. Certain factors play a role in influencing that decision. Among those factors are cost, access port utilized, the level of training and skills commanded by the surgeon. It costs much more to use articulating instruments compared to using standard ones. However, the use of specialized tools promotes safety and efficiency.

The degree of awareness of SILS among surgeons is very high. However, the performance of SILS is limited to a few surgeons owing to its high level of complexity, limited space of access, and the use of specialized instruments. Surgical doctors who perform the procedure have to be highly skills and trained in surgical processes. That has promoted negative perception from the public and limited indulgence in the process.

A wide variety of surgeries makes use of SILS. Common examples comprise of sleeve gastrectomy, colectomy, adjustable gastric banding, appendectomy, nephrectomy, sacrocolpopexy, and hysterectomy among others. In European nations and the US, standard instruments are in wide usage when compared to specialized ones used in many other countries out of these two regions.




About the Author:



No comments:

Post a Comment